Jesus spent his time in the Gospels to move all the people he meets, to get them out of their identity. That identity is infamous (like the tax collector or prostitute), "well regarded" by the standard of his time (such as religious Jews) or "well regarded" by the readers for whom the Gospels are (as the disciples Jesus spends his time shaking).
Paul calls to abandon the identity markers of Judaism but not conducive to making new identifier to the new religion. As written by Alain Badiou (4) "The truth is diagonal with respect to any subset community, it allows itself any identity and does not constitute any". Yet two thousand years later, we not only accumulate markers of identity (hetero-French Protestants, liberals, for example) (5) but we want to return the others - gays in this case - the identity we would have chosen for them. There would be "bad" gay (the drag queen, the sado-masochistic etc..) And "good" gay clone Bertrand Delanoe, for example. Part of gays and lesbians play this game, inventing an identity gay or just a hetero identity assimilation. In both cases, isolationism anyway, as is also the hetero. In contrast to this, in the tradition of Michel Foucault was born in the 80 United States, the Queer movement. David Halperin, a Queer theorists, explains (6): "Unlike gay identity, which while firmly conceived as an act of affirmation, is nevertheless rooted in the fact of a positive homosexual object choice, queer identity does not need to rely on any truth or a stable reality. (...) The queer does not defines a positivity but a normative position in relation to (...) Foucault sees homosexuality not as a species newly liberated human beings, but as a strategic marginal position, from which it can maintain and create new forms of relationship to oneself and others. " Foucault's approach to incorporating ancient Greek, "the work to be done," said Didier Eribon, then it will be life, he will reinvent individually and collectively, to no longer the same as what we were, and to escape what happens to us. " Does not find it not structuring the topics under the "no ... but" as Badiou points in Paul? "Structuring the topic as a" no but ... "which means it is not a state, but become (...) Because the" no "is dissolving potential of the specific closed (whose" law "is the name ), while the "but" indicates the task, the subjects whose faithful work of the open process by the event (whose name is "grace") are co-workers. " Only downside to this quote from Badiou: the event is not it the resurrection of Christ ("death and resurrection"), the "paschal journey" as we have seen that it could be actualized in the individual output closet? Modification of the body (body piercing, body-building ...) to the invention of new forms of families of a certain sentence intonation, gesture, creating new forms of celebration and music, this "work "is a path to collective self-invention that is possible, a permanent displacement of his own nature human creator permanent exile only stopping in any identity. Watch really gay-pride as we take the time to look at a landscape to capture all the details, then it is to risk not seeing a lot of gays are like everyone, but to distinguish individuals in their diversity, to see that there is something even more "bizarre" that what we thought: individuals who are inventing new forms of human natures. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment