- I confess that I take some precautions oratories. Before addressing the question, I quoted Pascal and Montaigne.
- What do they have much to do with it?
- Hold: these are two phrases that I want to pin an epigraph, it seems they put the discussion on a good footing .
- Let these quotes.
- You know that of Pascal: I'm very much afraid that this nature is itself only a first custom, as custom is a second nature.
In fact, I had to see it.
I emphasize the "I am very frightened."
Because?
I like it to be scared. I make sure it's enough.
- And see the Montaigne.
- The laws of conscience that we say born of nature, born of custom.
- I know you're reading. You can find what you want in a library well done, looking good. Anyone! for a breakaway line to Pascal, and that you interpret as you like, you have beautiful front of you hide behind him!
- Believe me, I'd be spoiled for choice. I copied him with other phrases that show that I did not distort his thought. Read.
He handed me a sheet where the words were transcribed:
The nature of human nature is, omne animal. There is nothing that renders natural. There is natural that we should not waste.
- Or if you prefer:
- He handed me another sheet where I read:
No doubt nature is not so uniform. It is the custom makes it so, because it constrains nature, and sometimes the nature overcomes, and keeps man in his instincts despite all custom, good or bad.
- Are you saying that heterosexuality is simple matter of custom?
- Not so! But we believe that according to custom by not taking for natural as heterosexuality.
- Pascal would be flattered if he knew for what purpose do you serve!
- I do not divert his mind. It is important to understand that where you say "against nature", the word "custom cons" would suffice. Convinced of that we will raise it with less prevention, I hope.
- Your quote is double-edged sword, I can argue against you imported from Asia or Africa to Europe, and Germany, England or Italy
France, the customs of pederasty were able to here and there, we contaminate any time. Thank you God! the natural and good old Gallic funds has always reappeared, gallant as it should, even fellow necessary, robust '.
Corydon got up and walked a few moments the room without saying anything. He finally said:
- Dear friend, I implore you, do not speak here about nationalism. In Africa, where I traveled, Europeans are convinced that this evil is allowed at the time, the beauty of helping race, they give more free rein in their country of origin; this is that their hand, Muslims are convinced that these tastes them come from Europe ...
- Let me believe however that the example and play their role in training, and the laws of imitation ...
- Do you do you not notice that they act both in the other direction? Remember the profound words of La Rochefoucauld: 11 5 people who have never been in love if they had never heard of love. - Consider that in our society, our morals, all predestined one sex to another, any sign of heterosexuality, while prompted, everything causes, theater, book, newspaper, for example displayed Seniors parade of shows, Street. If you do not get any love with her is that it was rude, jokingly exclaimed Dumas son in the preface to the question of money. What! if the youth gives way at last as of aiding and abetting the room, you do not want to assume that the board was able to guide his choice, the pressure tilt in the direction indicated his desire! But if, despite advice, invitations, provocations of all kinds, it's clear that a homosexual inclination, you immediately blame this reading, such influence, (and you argue the same for an entire country, for a nation) c is an acquired taste, you say, we taught him, for sure; you do not admit that he could invent itself.
- I do not accept that he could invent if healthy, precisely because I do not recognize this taste for spontaneous than in the invert, the degenerate or ill.
- What! here is taste, inclination, that all cache and everything upsets, who has permission to show or in the arts, or in books or in life, which falls under the law when it and asserts that as soon as you nail to the pillory of shame, exposed to ridicule, insults, contempt almost universal ...
- Calm down! calm yourself! Your uranist is a great inventor.
- I'm not saying he invented still, but I say that when imitation is that he wanted to imitate the example flattered his secret taste.
- Decidedly you hold that this taste is innate.
- Just as I see it ... And will you permit me to remark that this taste, moreover, can hardly do inherit this specious reason that the very act which is necessarily convey an act of heterosexuality ...
- The joke is clever.
- Admit that it is necessary that this appetite is very strong, very irresistible, well embedded in the flesh Similarly, say the word: very natural, to withstand insults
and does not consent to finally disappear. It looks, do not you think, to a continuous burst with great difficulty here is blind, who reappeared a bit later, which can not dry out the source. Sévissez, you'll do fine! Squeeze! Oppress! It will not delete.
) 
Paul calls to abandon the identity markers of Judaism but not conducive to making new identifier to the new religion. As written by Alain Badiou (4) "The truth is diagonal with respect to any subset community, it allows itself any identity and does not constitute any". Yet two thousand years later, we not only accumulate markers of identity (hetero-French Protestants, liberals, for example) (5) but we want to return the others - gays in this case - the identity we would have chosen for them. There would be "bad" gay (the drag queen, the sado-masochistic etc..) And "good" gay clone Bertrand Delanoe, for example. Part of gays and lesbians play this game, inventing an identity gay or just a hetero identity assimilation. In both cases, isolationism anyway, as is also the hetero. In contrast to this, in the tradition of Michel Foucault was born in the 80 United States, the Queer movement. David Halperin, a Queer theorists, explains (6): "Unlike gay identity, which while firmly conceived as an act of affirmation, is nevertheless rooted in the fact of a positive homosexual object choice, queer identity does not need to rely on any truth or a stable reality. (...) The queer does not defines a positivity but a normative position in relation to (...) Foucault sees homosexuality not as a species newly liberated human beings, but as a strategic marginal position, from which it can maintain and create new forms of relationship to oneself and others. " Foucault's approach to incorporating ancient Greek, "the work to be done," said Didier Eribon, then it will be life, he will reinvent individually and collectively, to no longer the same as what we were, and to escape what happens to us. " Does not find it not structuring the topics under the "no ... but" as Badiou points in Paul? "Structuring the topic as a" no but ... "which means it is not a state, but become (...) Because the" no "is dissolving potential of the specific closed (whose" law "is the name ), while the "but" indicates the task, the subjects whose faithful work of the open process by the event (whose name is "grace") are co-workers. " Only downside to this quote from Badiou: the event is not it the resurrection of Christ ("death and resurrection"), the "paschal journey" as we have seen that it could be actualized in the individual output closet? Modification of the body (body piercing, body-building ...) to the invention of new forms of families of a certain sentence intonation, gesture, creating new forms of celebration and music, this "work "is a path to collective self-invention that is possible, a permanent displacement of his own nature human creator permanent exile only stopping in any identity. Watch really gay-pride as we take the time to look at a landscape to capture all the details, then it is to risk not seeing a lot of gays are like everyone, but to distinguish individuals in their diversity, to see that there is something even more "bizarre" that what we thought: individuals who are inventing new forms of human natures. 
fact remained that it is a perversion. "Lacan 