Does Any Stores Offer Layaway?

Bush's Inaugural speech signals Satanic dark times for America, The World




© THE NOBEL FOUNDATION 2005
Newspapers have the general permission to publish this text in any language after December 7, 2005 5:30 p.m. hour in Stockholm. The authorization of the Foundation is required for publication in periodicals or books otherwise than in summary. The copyright notice above must accompany publication of all or major parts of the text.

Harold Pinter - Nobel Lecture
Art, Truth & Politics

In 1958 I wrote the following:
"There are no hard distinctions between what is real and what is unreal, between what is true and what is false. One thing is not necessarily true or false, it can be simultaneously true and false. "
I believe that these assertions still make sense and do still apply to the exploration of reality through art. So as a writer I by them but as a citizen I can not. As a citizen I must ask: What is true? What is wrong?
Truth in drama is forever elusive. You'll never find out exactly, but the search for it is compulsive search is clearly what drives the effort. The search is your task. Most of the time you stumble upon the truth by accident in the dark, colliding with it or just glimpsing an image or a shape which seems to correspond to the truth, often without realizing that you did. But the real truth is there has never, drama, one and only one truth to be discovered. There are many. These truths challenge each other, recoil from each other, reflect, ignore each other, tease, are blind to each other. You sometimes feel that they have found the truth in your hand for a moment, then it slips through your fingers and is lost.
I am often asked how my plays come about. I do not know. Not more than I can sum up my plays, except to say this is what happened. That what they said. That's what they did.
Most plays are engendered by a line, a word or an image. The given word is, often followed by the image closely. I'll give you two examples of aftershocks that came to my mind, quite unexpectedly, followed by an image, I myself followed.
The plays are The Homecoming and Old Times. The first line of The Homecoming is' What have you done with the scissors? The first line of Old Times is' Dark.
In a case like I did in the other no other indications.
In the first case someone was obviously looking for a pair of scissors and was demanding their whereabouts of someone else he suspected had probably stolen them. But one way or another I knew that the person to whom it is addressed damn scissors, as the one who posed the question elsewhere.
'Dark' I took to be a description of someone's hair, the hair of a woman, and was the answer to a question. In either case, I found myself compelled to pursue the matter. This happened visually, a very slow fade, through shadow into light.
I always start a play by calling the characters A, B and C.
In the play that became The Homecoming I saw a man enter a stark room and ask his question of a younger man sitting on an ugly sofa, nose in a racing paper. I somehow suspected that A was a father and that B was his son, but I had no proof. This was however confirmed a short time later when B (later to become Lenny) says to A (later to become Max), 'Dad, do you mind if I change the subject? I want to ask you something. What we ate for dinner just now, how it was called? You call it? Why do not you buy a dog? You're a dog cook. Honestly. You think you're cooking for a bunch of dogs. 1 "So since B calls A 'Dad' it seemed reasonable to assume they were father and son. A was also clearly the cook and his cooking did not seem to be held in high esteem. Did this mean that there was no mother? I did not know. But as I told myself At the time, our beginnings never know what our ends.
"Bruns. A large window. Evening sky. A man, A (later to become Deeley), and a woman, B (later to become Kate), sitting with drinks. "Fat or thin? The man asks. Who are they talking about? Then I see, standing at the window, a woman, C (later to become Anna), in a different quality of light, their backs, brown hair.
It is a strange moment, when you create characters that did not exist previously. What follows is fitful, uncertain, even hallucinatory, although sometimes it may take the form of an avalanche that nothing can stop it. The position of the author is an odd one. In a sense, the characters do not make them welcome. The characters resist him, they are not easy to live, they are impossible to define. You certainly can not dictate to them. To some extent you engage with them in a game-ending, playing cat and mouse, blind man's buff, hide and seek. But finally you find that you have on the arm of flesh and blood beings with will and an individual sensibility of their own, made of component parts you are unable to change, manipulate or distort.
So language in art remains a highly ambiguous transaction, a quicksand, a trampoline, a frozen pool which might give way under your feet, you are the author, from one moment to another.
But as I said, the search for truth can never stop. It can not be adjourned, it can not be postponed. It must be faced, right there, right away.
Political theater has a completely different set of problems. The sermons are to be avoided at all price. Objectivity is essential. It must be allowed to breathe an air that belongs to them. The author can not confine and constrict them to satisfy the taste or disposition or prejudice that are his. He must be prepared to approach them from different angles, in very different perspectives, knowing neither brake nor limit, take them by surprise, perhaps, from time to time, while leaving them free to follow the path they please. It does not always work. And political satire, of course, adheres to none of these precepts, in fact does precisely the reverse, which is its proper function.
In my play The Birthday Party I think I run courses of very different interpretation, leaving them to operate in a dense forest of possibility before to focus ultimately on an act of submission.
Mountain Language pretends does not operate openly. It remains brutal, short and ugly. The soldiers in the play do get some fun out of the situation. One sometimes forgets that torturers become easily bored. They need to laugh a bit to keep morale high. As has been confirmed of course by the events at Abu Ghraib in Baghdad. Language the mountain takes only twenty minutes, but it could go on for hours and hours, tirelessly repeating the same pattern over and over again for hours and hours.
Ashes to Ashes, for its part, seems to take place underwater. A drowning woman, her hand reaching up through the surface waves, dropping down out of sight, reaching for others, but finding nobody there, either above or below water finding only shadows, reflections, floating; the woman a lost figure in a drowning landscape, a woman unable to escape the doom that seemed to belong only to others.
But as the others died, she must die too.
Political language, as used by politicians, never ventures on such land, as most politicians, according to the evidence we have, not interested in the truth but power and the maintenance of that power. To maintain that power it is essential that people remain in ignorance, that they live in ignorance of the truth, even the truth of their own lives. What surrounds us therefore is a vast tapestry of lies, upon which we feed.
As everyone here knows, the argument advanced to justify the invasion of Iraq was that Saddam Hussein possessed a highly dangerous body of weapons of mass destruction, some of which could be fired in 45 minutes, bringing about appalling devastation. We were assured that was true. This was not true. We were told that Iraq had relations with Al Qaeda and had therefore shared responsibility for the atrocity of September 11, 2001 in New York. We were assured that was true. This was not true. We were told that Iraq threatened the security of the world. We were assured that was true. It was not true.
The truth is something entirely different. The truth is related to how the United States understands its role in the world and how it chooses to embody it.
But before I come back this time, I consider the recent history, I mean the foreign policy of the United States since the end of the Second World War. I believe it is obligatory upon us to subject this period to scrutiny, if limited, inevitably, by the time we have here.
Everyone knows what happened in the Soviet Union and throughout Europe East during the postwar period: the systematic brutality, the widespread atrocities, the ruthless suppression of independent thought. All this has been fully documented and verified.
But I argue that the crimes committed by the United States during this same period have only been superficially recorded, let alone documented, let alone acknowledged, let alone recognized as crimes at all. I think the issue must be addressed and that the truth has an obvious relationship with the current state of the world. Although constrained, to some extent by the existence of the Soviet Union's actions in the world by the United States made it clear that they had concluded it had carte blanche to do what they wanted.
Direct invasion of a sovereign state has never been, in fact, the preferred method of America. Overall, it has preferred what she called "low intensity conflict." "Low intensity conflict", it means that thousands of people die but slower than if you dropped a bomb on them to a single coup.Cela means that you infect the heart the country, that you establish a malignant tumor and you watch the gangrene bloom. Once the populace has been subdued - or beaten to death - it is the same - and your friends, the military and the great corporations, sit comfortably in power, you go before the camera and say that democracy is the won. Was a commonplace in U.S. foreign policy in the years to which I refer.
The tragedy of Nicaragua was a highly significant case. If I decide to mention here is he convincingly shows how America sees its role in the world, both then and now.
I attended a meeting held at the U.S. Embassy in London in the late 80s.
The U.S. Congress was about to decide whether to give more money to the Contras in their campaign against the government of Nicaragua. I was there as a member of a delegation speaking on behalf of Nicaragua but the most important member of this delegation was a Father John Metcalf. The leader of the U.S. body was Raymond Seitz (then number two to the ambassador, himself appointed ambassador thereafter). Father Metcalf said: "Sir, I am in charge of a parish in northern Nicaragua. My parishioners built a school, health center, a cultural center. We lived in peace. A few months ago a Contra force attacked the parish. They destroyed everything: the school, health center, the cultural center. They raped nurses and teachers, slaughtered doctors, in the most brutal. They behaved like savages. I beg of you, insist that the U.S. government withdraw its support from this shocking terrorist activity. "
Raymond Seitz had a very good reputation as a rational man, responsible and very knowledgeable. He was greatly respected in diplomatic circles. He listened, paused and then spoke with some gravity. "Father," he said, let me tell you something. In time of war, innocent people always suffer. There was a frozen silence. We watched with one eye fixed. He did not flinch.
Innocent people, indeed, always suffer. Finally someone
said: "But in our case" innocent people "were the victims of a gruesome atrocity funded by your government, one among many. If Congress provides more money to the Contras, other atrocities of this kind will take place. Is not this the case? Is your government not therefore guilty of supporting acts of murder and destruction upon the citizens of a sovereign state? "
Seitz was imperturbable. "I do not agree that the facts as we have been presented support your assertions," he said.
As we were leaving the Embassy a U.S. aide told me he enjoyed my plays. I did not answer.
I must remind you that at the time President Reagan made the following statement: 'The Contras are the moral equivalent of our Founding Fathers. "
The United States has for over forty years supported the brutal Somoza dictatorship in Nicaragua. The Nicaraguan people, led by the Sandinistas, overthrew this regime in 1979, a breathtaking popular revolution.
The Sandinistas were not perfect. They had their share of arrogance and their political philosophy included a number of contradictory elements. But they were intelligent, rational and civilized. Their goal was to create a stable, decent, pluralistic society. The death penalty has been abolished. Hundreds of thousands of poverty stricken peasants were brought back from the dead. Over 100,000 families were given title to land. Two thousand schools were built. A literacy campaign quite remarkable brought down the illiteracy rate in the country to below 15%. Free education was introduced as well as free services health. Infant mortality has fallen by a third. Polio has been eradicated.
The United States denounced these achievements as Marxist-Leninist subversion. In the eyes of the U.S. government, Nicaragua gave a dangerous example. If Nicaragua was allowed to establish basic norms of social and economic justice, if it was allowed to raise the level of medical care and education and achieve social unity and national self respect, neighboring countries would ask the same questions and do the same answers. There was of course the time, El Salvador, fierce resistance to the status quo.
I spoke earlier about 'a tapestry of lies' which surrounds us. President Reagan commonly described Nicaragua as a 'totalitarian dungeon'. What the media, and certainly the British government, were generally held for accurate and fair comment. Yet there was no record of death squads under the Sandinista government. There was no record of torture. There was no record of military brutality, systematic or official. No priests were ever murdered in Nicaragua. There were even three priests in the Sandinista government, two Jesuits and a missionary of the Maryknoll Society. The totalitarian dungeons were actually next door, El Salvador and Guatemala. The United States had in 1954 brought down the democratically elected government of Guatemala and it is estimated that over 200,000 people had been victims of military dictatorships were followed.
In 1989, six of the most distinguished Jesuits in the world were viciously murdered at the Central American University in San Salvador by a battalion of the regiment trained at Fort Benning Alcatl, Georgia, USA. Archbishop Romero, this brave man, was murdered while celebrating mass. An estimated 75,000 people died. Why were these people killed? They were killed because they were convinced that a better life was possible and should happen. That belief immediately qualified them as communists. They died because they dared to challenge the status quo, the endless plateau of poverty, disease, degradation and oppression, the only right they had acquired at birth.
The United States finally brought down the Sandinista government. It took several years and last show considerable resistance but relentless economic persecution and 30,000 dead finally undermined the spirit of Nicaraguans. They were exhausted and poverty stricken once again. The casinos moved back into the country. That was the end of free health and free education. Business has made a comeback. 'Democracy' had prevailed.
But this 'policy' was not limited in any way to Central America. It was conducted throughout the world. It was endless. And it's as if it never happened.
The United States supported and in many cases engendered every right wing military dictatorship in the world after the Second World War. I refer to Indonesia, Greece, Uruguay, Brazil, Paraguay, Haiti, Turkey, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, and, of course, Chile. The horror the United States inflicted upon Chile in 1973 can never be purged and can never be forgotten.
Hundreds of thousands of deaths took place throughout these countries. Have they taken place? And are they in all cases attributable to foreign policy U.S.? The answer is yes, they took place and they are attributable to American foreign policy. But you never know.
It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it was not happening. It did not matter. It was of no interest. The crimes committed by the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about. Let the justice in America: it has delivered around the world, a quite clinical manipulation of power while masquerading as a force acting in the universal good. A case of hypnosis brilliant, even witty, highly successful.
The United States, I tell you, is without doubt the greatest show on time. Brutal, indifferent, scornful and ruthless it may be so, but it's also very clever. Like a salesman it is out on its own and the article he sells best is love of self. Guaranteed success. Listen to all American presidents on television say the words' the American people, "as in the sentence: "I told the American people it is time to pray and to defend the rights of the American people and I ask the American people to trust their president in the action he is about to take on behalf of the American people. "
a scintillating stratagem. Language is actually employed to keep thought at bay. The words 'the American people' provide a truly voluptuous cushion of reassurance. You do not need to think. Simply lie on your pillow. It may be that this cushion suffocating your intelligence and your critical faculties but it's very comfortable. Which of certainly not worth the 40 million people living below the poverty line and the 2 million men and women imprisoned in the vast gulag of prisons, which extends from one end to another U.S. States.
The United States no longer bothers about low intensity conflict. They no longer see the desirability for being reticent or even devious. They play cards on the table, without distinction. Quite simply, they do not care UN, international law or critical dissent, which they feel they have no power or relevance. And then they have their bleating little lamb that follows them around the end of a leash, Great Britain, pathetic and supine.
What has happened to our moral sensibility? Did we ever have any? What do these words mean? Do they refer to a term very rarely employed these days - conscience? A conscience to do not only with our own acts but is also related to the responsibility that is ours in the acts of others? Is all this dead? Look at Guantanamo. Hundreds of people detained without charge for over three years without legal representation or due process, theoretically detained forever. This totally illegitimate structure is maintained in defiance of the Geneva Convention. Not only tolerated but hardly the so-called "international community" in fact any event. This criminal outrage is being committed right now by a country that professes to be "the leader of the free world." Is what we think about the inhabitants of Guantanamo Bay? What the media say? They wake up from time to time we lay a small item on page six. These men were relegated to a no man's land from which indeed they may never return. At present many are on strike euxfont hunger, they are force-fed, including British residents. No niceties in these force-feeding procedures. No sedative or anesthetic. Just a tube stuck up your nose and you are sent down into the throat. You vomit blood. This is torture. That said British Foreign Minister? Nothing. Said that British Prime Minister? Nothing. And why? Because the United States has said: to criticize our conduct in Guantanamo Bay constitutes an unfriendly act. You're either with us or you're against us. So Blair shuts up.
Invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law. The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of public intervention aimed at strengthening military and economic control of America on the Middle East and masquerading - as a last resort - all other justifications having failed to prove their merits - as liberation. A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people.
We brought the Iraqi people torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, humiliation and death and we call it 'bringing freedom and democracy in the Middle East. "
How many people you have to kill before you qualify under a mass murderer and war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Court of Justice. But Bush has been clever. It has not ratified the Court International Justice. So if an American soldier or, a fortiori, an American politician, was to find the dock Bush has warned he would send the Marines. But Tony Blair, himself, has ratified the Court and may be available for prosecution can communicate his address to the Court if they're interested. He lives at 10 Downing Street, London.
Death in this context is irrelevant. Bush and Blair are both very careful to put it aside. At least 100,000 Iraqis were killed by U.S. bombs and missiles before the Iraq insurgency began. These people are negligible. Their death does not exist. Nothingness. They are not even recorded as being dead. "We do not count the bodies," said the American general Tommy Franks.
the early days of the invasion was a photo published in the pages of British newspapers, we see Tony Blair kissing the cheek of a little Iraqi boy. 'A grateful child,' said the caption. A few days later we could find, inside pages, the story and photo of another little boy of four who had no arms. His family had been blown up by a missile. It was the only survivor. " When do I get my arms? He asked. The story went out the window. Well yes, Tony Blair does not tighten against him, nor does it hugged the body of any other mutilated child, nor the body of any bloody corpse. Blood is dirty. It dirties your shirt and tie when you're a sincere speech on television cameras.
The 2,000 American dead are an embarrassment. They are transported to their graves in the dark. Funerals are unobtrusive, safe place. The mutilated rot in their beds, some for the rest of their lives. So the dead and the mutilated both rot, in different kinds of graves.
Here is an excerpt from "I explain some things," a poem by Pablo Neruda:
And one morning all that was on fire,
one morning the bonfires leapt out of the earth

devouring human beings, and therefore this
was on fire, gunpowder from
,
and it was blood.
Bandits with planes, with the Moors, bandits with
rings and duchesses, bandits with
black monks to bless
fell from the sky to kill children,
through the streets and children's blood
flowed simply, like children's blood.
Jackals that the jackals would despise,
stones that the dry thistle would bite on and spit out, vipers that the vipers
abominate
face you've seen the blood of Spain

rising to drown you in one wave
of pride and knives! Overall

of treason
see my dead house, look at broken Spain
:
but each appears a dead house burning metal
in lieu of flowers, but each gap
of Spain Spain emerges
,
but from every dead child a rifle emerged with eyes, but
of each crime bullets are born which will one day
place your
heart.
You ask why his poetry speaks
does not dream, leaves,
the great volcanoes of his native country?
Come see the blood in the streets,

come see the blood in the streets,

come see the blood in the streets! 2
Let me clear that in quoting from Neruda's poem I am in no way trying to compare Republican Spain to Saddam Hussein's Iraq. I quote Neruda because I have never read elsewhere in contemporary poetry such a powerful visceral description of the bombing of civilians.
I said earlier that the United States were now totally frank about putting its cards on the table. This is indeed the case. Its official declared policy is now defined as "full spectrum dominance" (a total domination on all fronts). The term is not mine, it is theirs. 'Full spectrum dominance' means control of land, sea, air and space and all attendant resources.
The United States now occupies 702 military installations in 132 countries worldwide, with the honorable exception of Sweden, of course. We do not know how they got there, but one thing is certain is that they are there.
The United States possesses 8,000 active and operational nuclear warheads. 2000 are on high alert, ready to be launched with a warning time of 15 minutes. They develop new systems of nuclear force, known as "bunker busters" (bunker busters). The British, ever cooperative, are intending to replace their own nuclear missile, Trident. Who, I wonder, are they? Osama Bin Laden? You? Me? Doe? China? Paris? Who knows? What we know is that this infantile insanity - the possession nuclear weapons and threaten to use it - is at the heart of present American political philosophy. We must remember that the U.S. is on a permanent war footing and does not suggest in this matter no sign of relaxation.
Thousands if not millions, of people in the United States are full of shame and anger, visibly disgusted by the actions of their government, but the current state of things, they are not a coherent political force - not yet. That said, the anxiety, uncertainty and fear which we can see growing daily in the United States are unlikely to diminish.
I know that President Bush has to write his speeches many extremely competent, but I'd like to volunteer for the position. I propose the following short address which he can make on the television to the nation. I see him grave, hair carefully combed, serious, winning, sincere, often beguiling, sometimes employing a wry smile, curiously attractive, a man more at ease with men.
"God is good. God is great. God is good. My God is good. Bin Laden's God is bad. His is a bad God. Saddam's God was bad, except that Saddam did not. He was a barbarian. We are not barbarians. We do not chop people's heads. We believe in freedom. God, too. I am not a barbarian. I am the democratically elected leader of a freedom-loving democracy. We are a compassionate society. We administer compassionate electrocution and compassionate lethal injection. We are a great nation. I am not a dictator. Him, yes. I am not a barbarian. Him, yes. And he is. They all are. I possess moral authority. You see this fist? That is my moral authority. Try not remember that. "
The life of a writer is a highly vulnerable, almost naked. No need to cry about it. The writer makes his choice, a choice that it sticks to the skin. But it is fair to say that you are exposed to the winds, some of them icy indeed. You work alone, isolated from everything. You find no shelter, no protection - unless you lie - in which case of course you have built and maintained your own protection and, it could be argued, you became a politician.
I talked about death quite often this soir.Je going to read one of my poems, entitled "Death."
Where did the dead body found?
Who found the dead body?
The corpse was dead when he was found?
How was the dead body found?
Who was the corpse?
Who was the father or daughter or brother Or uncle
or sister or mother or son Of
body abandoned?
Was the body dead when abandoned?
Was the body abandoned?
By whom had it been abandoned?
The corpse was naked or dressed for a journey?
What made this body, you declared dead?
The corpse, you declared dead?
well did you know the dead body?
How did you know that the body was dead?
Have you washed the corpse
Did you close both its eyes Did you bury
body
Have you abandoned
Did you kiss the corpse
When we look into a mirror we think the image that confronts us is accurate. But move a millimeter and the image changes. We're actually looking at an endless array of reflections sometimes a writer has to smash the mirror - for it is the other side of that mirror that the truth stares at us.
I believe that despite the enormous odds which exist, unflinching, with a dogged determination, unswerving, define, as citizens, the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory.
If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what we so nearly lost to us - the dignity of man.

1. Harold Pinter: The Back. Translation Éric Kahane. Gallimard, 1969.

2. Pablo Neruda: "I explain some things," in Residence on Earth, III. Translation Guy Suares. Gallimard, 1972. Translation Séverine Magois

Sapphire On I Love Money

funny

Paris this September 24, 1976

Sir


Thank you for your letter which opens a debate. I would like to make one response to what it is, in my report mathematics and reality. When
I8? 7 Cantor unlike what he and his colleagues believed, demonstrated that there is a bijection between the right and the plan, supported his demonstration of a figure. I1 "sees" this bijection. He wrote to Dedekind, June 29 of that year, two or three days after having forwarded his discovery: "This
I've recently communicated to me is even if unexpected, so again, I could not say so to reach a some peace of mind until I have received honored friend, your opinion on its accuracy, as ye have not approved, I can only say: I see but I do not think so. "
The question of what he does not believe, based on what is illusion. We can say that what distinguishes the source of magic, conjuring, it is just an illusion. If you believe, and we must believe as hard as iron, it's magic. Otherwise, i `s handling is: we know that there is a trick but we do not see. Which is unveiled at Cantor Dedekind this thing by writing: "All authors have obviously made the tacit assumption, quite natural for a redetermination of the points of a continuous manifold using new coordinates , they must also be continuous functions. This formula
Cantor: "I see but I do not think so" seems very strange. Indeed, usually, one wants to see. In? Insurance this year, a chapel was closed (by the priest) as the sun set on the windows projected onto the wall a shadow
that the villagers and those from the neighborhood, took him for an apparition of the Blessed Virgin. If it's a collective pareidolia, note that in reaching this extreme you have to believe (in the Virgin Mary) to see her, and that the adage that everyone should see it to believe it seems somewhat inadequate.
illusion leads to creation. Nothing is simple, can the mathematician has the power to create mathematical entities, which will become part of mathematical reality, moreover, by means of a symbol.
The problem of creation / illusion is illuminated Winnicott. The question, he writes, a mother to her child never ask about an object transitionel is: "This object, you have created, or was there already?". And elsewhere: "There is a moment of illusion, a fragment of experience that is regarded as his own hallucination thing belonging to external reality."
It seems to me that this mathematical approach to work, at any level, with reference to the concepts introduced by Winnicott in particular can help to understand and explain many facts related to mathematics, especially what it is mathematical relationships / Realta. The issue eg postulate of Euclid (its dependence compared to others. Axioms) that came into physical reality is therefore that we believe.

I believe we must consider the mathematical activity as a playground located between external reality and the perceived ob ectively "extensions of the self", ie subjective objects. Envous thanks, I beg you to believe Mr. my best feelings.

Abscess On Pubic Area And Inner Thighs

The Black Book of pasychanalyse. Bad

"WHO IS" scilicet "?

Scilicet: you may know, this is the meaning of this title. You can know now that I failed in teaching that addressed twelve years as psychoanalysts, and they made the last four years, met with what, in December 1967 at the Ecole Normale Superieure where I speak, I made as tribute to the number.
In both of these times, I failed to break the evil spell which is exercised in the order in force in the psychoanalytical societies existing on the practice of psychoanalysis and its theoretical production, from each other in solidarity.
This review is one way which I expect to overcome in my school, which is distinguished by its principle of such companies, the obstacle that I resinated elsewhere.
Scilicet: you can know what will happen now.
Who this is for you there yet? Are you nothing but the in-game to be in a time that is emerging to be the origin of some of what he has missed only be played? This time is nothing, but it makes you doubly lost Eurydice, you who stand as the issue.
I say that psychoanalysis is not playing the game with you, it does not support what yet with you she wants. It is this: that the being who thinks (except that it is as he does not know), that this being, I say, not as a question without thinking of sex: sex
he does belong to by since it's being raised as a question. Whether these effects are
irrépudiables now, that their revelation is the trait appeared wild expedients which there firewall, it is likely that savagery would increase each day as the denial of this revelation is what which psychoanalysis is directly responsible to fail to report the defect is in the beginning.
is what she did in the Ratag referring to a welfare speech. Deviation to be an example for the status of ideology, when one source observed instead of digestion in the professional ethics of the psychoanalyst.
You I seek, although I know my share of fun.
is why I decided to call you: bachelor, to remind you of your place in this empire of pedantry, has become prevalent enough to make your fall even in this world do you promise to nothing more than the sewer culture. Not hope to escape it, even register the party.
Thus I myself am allowed to say structuralist tub and a most distinguished of my supporters, warned me: "You are now at the bachelor" (in other words: he wants Lacan) .
remains preserved in this thy name cache bachelor. At least I know that it implies, not those pedants in which the word can evoke Franglais something other than English itself: bachelor, that is to say, not yet married.
So you're not obliged to support the reverence due to the merits of a person, reckless of bias in the matter.
Now let me introduce you: Scilicet. "


But who wants to know?

lure condition, allah binding.

Past Owners On Car Titles

analysis!

The 7 / 07 I wrote Free with SFR. Nope:

PARIS (Dow Jones) - Iliad (403591.FR), parent company of ISP Free, gaining 5.9% to EUR42, 41 on rumors of acquisition by Bouygues (12050.FR), says a trader. These rumors have arisen following the announcement by Bouygues Wednesday morning at a meeting of analysts following the announcement of its interim results, the group intends to engage in fixed telephony. "People speculate that the Iliad would be an ideal target for Bouygues on this issue," said the operator. Bouygues and Iliad were not immediately available for comment. Bouygues fell 0.8% to EUR36, 42. (AUS)

Lol.

Best Mid Priced Dive Computer

Haine, phobia ...

On http://www.bibliotheque.refer.org/litoi/2-4.htm I read that:

Octave Mannoni, who later became a psychoanalyst Lacan, was professor of philosophy at the Lycée Gallieni Tananarive, immediately before the war, and after 1945, Chief Information Madagascar.À this capacity he was responsible for the review of Madagascar, the official propaganda organ of the General Government, where he guided the literary pages, to make them reflect the rich literary tradition of Madagascar. In 1950 he published an essay, The Psychology of Colonization, supported by examples drawn from recent and terrible "events" of 1947 in Madagascar. The book has been strongly attacked by Aimé Césaire (in the Discourse on Colonialism) and Franz Fanon (In The Wretched of the Earth). Mannoni it asked about violence at work in the settlement: if, on the one hand, European colonialism is often someone who can not face his peers and who chooses to impose upon the colonized that his racism turns into lower (Mannoni suggests this formula very strong: The Negro [with all the connotations that the word could be taken in the colonial context] is the fear that the white man himself), on the other hand, the colonized sometimes goes in front of domination, as if waiting, hoping, in a messianic desire, those who will take charge (think of structure Mannoni psychological as that induced by the tsinyet todydes Malagasy, but also the attitude of the Indians of Mexico before Cortes). Mannoni's analysis could only be poorly received when the fire took in all walks of the French colonial empire and that claims of absolute independence was everywhere agenda jour.Mais today that it never ceases to break the post-colonial era, the book Mannoni (it was reissued in 1984 under a title which refers to the Tempêtede fortunately Shakespeare) opened perhaps a few ways to think of the clashes cultures.

Before becoming the controversial thinker colonization, Mannoni had given the magazine a few Malagasy firmly verse poems (where you can sometimes hear a distant echo of Saint-John Perse) "

After the war he was urgently recalled to France for daring suggest to grant independence in Madagascar, but the rest seems correct.

This made me think of the words like racism, anti-Semitism, ageism, homophobia, which I smeblent etylémogiquement weird.

Semitism is adhering to the theory of a Semitic people, including Jews and Arabs are. This is the meaning of the suffix ism in French, no?

Homophobia is the summit. (Obviously this is linked with the Negro is the fear that ...).

was μισέο hate is the opposite of love φιλέο. Filéo used well, philately.

also used misséo: misogyne.Mais in a way that's who does not love, not hate that.

hatred and fear.

Must dig.

Toy Story Birthday Party Invitations Wording

Wikipedia.

Let some thoughts on Wikipedia, which I think is a good example of where too often lead the good intentions, hell is paved.

1) Unlike the most famous, popular, and used complex FOSS, Linux, the fact that there is no coordinator (Linus Torvalds for Linux) that gives the "OK" to exit the final broadcast of a core (kernel), or project teams who endorse the releases new versions as Apache or sendmail shows
demonstrates the usefulness of this validation process of diffusion.

In this sense that Wikipedia is the supreme example of free applied to the field of knowledge, my God, it would be like saying, yes I force the line which is not at all in my habits, that Anarchy is the model ultimede democracy.

It is true that things are going now or I end up asking me if you have not reached the limits of the model, the Iranian president's words "we have still not made a revolution for democracy" to cause it to have come to grow on reflection which is rather enlightened when one refers to shaping policy of near and middle east in the period 1910 1945. I think TE Lawrence and Louis Massignon (who had visions co trary) had guessed what would happen thereafter.
(See, eg, Louis Massignon, The Sheik admirable, published by the Capuchin for the second edition, or Massigon Plon for the first edition of Christian Destremau Moncelon Jean, and Lawrence of Arabia Henri Laurens discoveries in Gallimard). (Oil, again and again. The dramatic events related to Hurricane Katrina also demonstrated the fragility of globalization, disruption of oil production has enormous consequences. But we reassure the ice cap melting, new oilfields will be able be put into operation, which will enable us to accelerate a little more global warming, so the disappearance of the ice sheet and loop).

We all know the importance and prestige of scientific journals lies in their community reviewer, and it is certain areas or elsewhere could now be dispensed with entirely publisher-printers, especially
mathematical typesetting tools such as TeX / LaTeX, the adoption of Unicode by Windows XP, Free fonts of law, did not make a utopia. Besides this point, see the notebooks of Srinivasa Ramanujan, who died in 1920, then fell into the public domain are sold € 100 each by a publisher well-known scientific monopoly hurts my heart, it's treasure humanity and a layout along with some notes seem to extend the property, so I scan them and I'll put on the internet I would likely culprit in the eyes of the PLI / PLA ETDE protection of copyright.

Passing on Ramanujan's obituary appeared in the annals of the British Mathematical Society is available at Gallica: http://gallica.bnf.fr/document?O=N056192 (Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1921, 99, p . XII-XXIX.). So

Wikipedia free model no. Model limitations and dangers of good intentions, yes.

2) I consulted Wikipedia for me to re-get an idea on four topics that I know a little.

Hepatitis C: two major errors (use of condoms, reversible side effects due to treatment by stopping this one). This is not what people are saying now quite numerous global conferences on the subject of consensus.

(Other errors confusion between chronic and acute, et al).

Worse in my opinion in the process, there are two external links that have the merit to specify the date of publication, but either we make an approach to a bibliography (which is still a minimum in an article popular science), it may not be exhaustive, but can not be reduced to two links!
For example, consensus conferences are online dating.

Biography Octave Mannoni. If properly refers to his book "Psychology of Colonization" controversy and criticism of his position made by Aimé Césaire and Frantz Fanon are simply ignored.

It does not matter except to suggest that his position was welcomed as a major advance in understanding the phenomenon from a psychological point of view ethno-logic machine.

Biography of Maud Mannoni: The School of Bonneuil never been founded with her husband.

The article on Jung ignores the period 1933-1937 where he was head of the German Psychoanalytic Society, and sentence: "We expect all our members that they have scientifically read" Mein Kampf "
and accepts as a base."

(In Linguing Shadows Shambreal, Boston & London, 1991

it is clear that the phrase

"The Society Expects all members Who Work as writers or speakers to work-through Afolf Hitler's Mein Kampf WITH ALL Scientific efforts and accept as it has basis "is published in the international edition of the company which Jung had the Presidency in its edition of December 1933.

On anti-Semitism of Jung, the Eleventh International Congress of Jungian psy (IAAP) held in Paris in 1989, concludes:
general acceptance
There Was That history (Jung) anti-Semitic WAS Behavior. I Think It Is clear it has taken to Jungian Collectively Fifty Years Begin the process in earnest. Jerome S Bernstein Jewish Jungian psychologist. They call

Jungian School of Zurich to a duty of memory.

Good, bad Jung did not like the cathos in the archives of the Countway Library of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine at Harvard, there are interviews with Jacobi in the journal Jolande ABJ (Jung's biographical archives December 23, 1989): "Jung sent me a furious letter learning
my decision to convert to Catholicism. Nobody's premises of mine who is in the Church. You'll have your confessor. I am for people who are outside the Church. "

I stopped.

So in my opinion Wikipedia is like the Internet, you can find anything and everything.

There is the possibility of re-writing history, not to convey that the official story, etc..

If the etymology comes from the Greek (ἑγκύκλιος παιαδεία) to set up a complete education, we really can not say that in this sense it is an encyclopedia, except to re-consider education as formatting time
available brain.

All this is quite reassuring: we can not dispense with the editorial board, editorial line, for scientific validation. In the same way that the search "full text" at hand offer a lot of noise does not make sense for a library reasoned (and not a pile of books).

And it's not the idea (which still share a good intent) of the Semantic Web by Tim Berners-Lee (see http://www.urfist.cict.fr/lettres/lettre28/lettre28- 22.html) that will fix things.

See what it is to wake up early on a Sunday, we have moods ...

Certificates To Say Thanks

Lacan, Saint John and the Discourse of Rome.






C'es funny to see that Lacan quote

Τὴν ἀρχὴν ὅ τι καὶ λαλῶ ὑμῖν; (What I keep telling you from the beginning.) Pretentious, anyway! Says it's in John VII 25, VIII, so it's 25.

While John VII is 25: Οὐχ οὗτός ἐστιν ὃν ζητοῦσιν ἀποκτεῖναι; (Is not the one they seek to die?).

Lol.

Texturizer Salon Ottawa

Inuit Art.

Definition of Soul: "Ice Fisherman" Manual of Lethbridge.

Pea Sized Lump In Throat Normal?

Look at the light effects!

The work is: http://www.ulrikebolenz.de/ before which I photographed.

Peliculas Incesto Online

Finally found this article "The Search"

Having sold my rights to the publisher was a big mistake! The
vla. Surf

a patient's medical lit
Equipped with an Internet connection, a good knowledge of English and sound common sense, any patient with a serious chronic illness now has the potential to exceed his anguish while surfing the Web. Illustration lived ...

A routine checkup that showed abnormalities, you get out of your home GP with a prescription from liver ultrasound, serology and HVA, HVB, HCV, HIV and cytomegalovirus. The analytical result is cryptic: "Hepatitis C Antibody (reagent Y generation and reactive ortho murex): positive search (the search for viral RNA by molecular biology may be indicated). "Your doctor then said:" You're going to call Dr. Thierry Poynard, at Mercy. It will give you an appointment in a few months. There is no risk in the short term, but it is better to be treated by a top team. We'll probably get a liver biopsy and offer treatment with interferon. " The information is essential to deliver: a Hepatitis C is a disease that develops in the long run, it ends in 25% of cases by a liver carcinoma, followed by coma about three months, and death . D

Here, anxiety earns you frankly. Take
immediately go to the pity and, meanwhile three months of rigor, decide to use your Internet connection to try to learn more. By interviewing your favorite search engine, you arrive at the site "Euroliver" where you learn that this virus is a single-stranded, positive polarity of about 9400 nucleotides, it measures 50 to 60 nm in diameter and has a molecular weight of 4,106 dal tones. When you read it encodes a large polypeptide of 3010 or 3011 amino acids, and it includes at least six genotypes, you feel you have erred in not following unit values of Biology university. Then you come across a site
U.S. Department of Energy, where you
explains everything a gentleman should know it's DNA, the human genome, how a
virus acts. Certainly, reading is difficult but worth the trouble
. You begin to see the tech-nical
related to recombinant DNA, and you'll discover
vrez a sort of online library containing a lot of articles from professional medical journals. This gives you the idea to type the keyword "Poynard. You're not disappointed with the teacher whom you go publishes extensively on the disease, and in leading journals.
Within days, you've discovered what this disease and what was the consensus protocol for treatment. You then decide to have the views of your colleagues, sick! First point that you worry: liver biopsy. While browsing a bit on a Geocities site, you learn that this examination of
routine "causes 10 deaths and 000 instruments, in 1% to 5 O / o cases, people suffer from pain in the arm Left comparable to the pain caused by myocardial infarction. Then you find an excellent Canadian site, facing the public and the site dedicated to hepatitis C, infectious disease center in Atlanta, which keeps you abreast of recent developments, in addition to the site of the American Liver Foundation
You find finally a discussion list about the disease, This allows you to converse with your colleagues in misfortune, to learn the tricks What one or the other to decrease the side effects of treatment, in short, you moral support. You convince your GP to prescribe a virus genotyping and quantitative PCR. With your new learning, you do not resist the pleasure of telling him that, technically speaking, it is a reverse PCR using as primer the 5 'noncoding region of the genome!
When you go to the hospital, the doctor tells you is what you already know. When you drag him: ¢ Do not you think that in the case of genotype 1b, interferon Amgen produces better results than alpha-2b? ", You immediately feel that he understood that you had worked a topic you want to get away, and we will not make you believe anything. You can then discuss (as equals would be very pretentious) the best treatment approach for you. You enjoy asking for morphine before and not after the biopsy ...

Today, the patient does not speak English unfortunately have no access to this information. And, perhaps more serious, the Internet user who does not instinctively journalist to check his sources will come across sites that describe treatments who at best assert that the most effective consensus protocol, to promise a cure worse than 100% with unknown treatment. The Internet is poised to revolutionize medicine, forcing doctors to retrain (for those who would not do) under pressure from patients' can now watch live a consensus conference, it takes place in Paris Montreal, Washington or Tokyo. Remain a major education effort be undertaken to explain to our children that it is certainly not because they have "seen on the Internet" that is true. We will need more than ever to learn to distinguish truth from falsehood. Bruno Mannoni

Indian Womens Bottom Less Images

Fixed Mobile Convergence ...

Good, the converged fixed / mobile smartphone's go after the announcements by BT and FT.

Now the question a few billion € is who will win between:

Symbian, Palm, RIM, Microsoft, Linux?

Avenues, not very scientific, but good.

FT systematically planting (sorry Jean-Noel) one must assume that Microsoft, bof, it will not do. The supply of residential based on the FT-boi box we know how many more will have to play that, as in Egypt, eh, frogs, flies, grasshoppers. Anyway Pharaoh has relented.

Palm? No. I not feel it at all. Why. Because the.

Symbian either. Too much market share, the! And a bid from Nokia, a bad strategy, over-segmentation of the market is more seasonal. "We are at a crossroads" said Simon Garth vice president of marketing.
"Our perception is simple: people do not want a combined all-in-one. For each use, there will be a specific mobile. Convergence will grow but the market will require customization"
.

Until now, Me, I did not combined all in one, raising their pockets lightened after the portfolio. But hey, RIM / Blackberry is a hit. And the end user almost always right ... Linux? Nah, nah, nah. Linux is as much about the wound-boxes d'Egypte play like Livebox, the necessary developments but it's just an OS ", warns Simon Garth immediately.
" It will take time to develop a serious alternative and homogeneous. This development will require significant costs. Those who think that Linux is free gravely mistaken "
. Pan on the beak!

Da'illeurs Palm whose market share in this niche are dropping from 20 to 10% in one year, PalmSource has even decided to abandon Development of Cobalt 6.1, its new OS designed for smartphones and high-end building on platforms derived from Linux.

Perseverare diabolicum. Mickey Chow has all the racks is very upset by RIM as usual:
"The extension of instant messaging features from the PC with Microsoft Office Communicator, to mobile devices like BlackBerry, is an essential element our strategy of integrated communications. It aims to unify communications between PCs, mobile phones and systems so that everyone can more easily communicate and collaborate more effectively. We look forward expand our development partnerships with manufacturers of mobile solutions like BlackBerry, to expand and further strengthen the interest of Live Communications. "
said Gurdeep Pall, corporate vice president of Real-Time Collaboration Group at Microsoft.
"With Microsoft, we are the benefits of Live Communications Server within the reach of BlackBerry users, and we strengthen the personal and business communications"
says his side Jim Balsillie, Chairman and Co-CEO RIM.

me, now I want a handset in one.

Will you say it will be a RIM !

no hustle.

Now that will be Free? BT's strategy is not dumb, they are not mobile operator alliance with Vodafone?

Free with SFR?

Wait.

Sbi Unit Plus Regular

Suite. Google

Unforeseen events that are more (?) Is the:

http://sabachtani.blogspot.com/

Hush.

Motherboard Pcb Trace Repair

A European?

A Google for a European digital library virtual: a pragmatic path.


As stated by the Minister of Culture and Communication (Le Monde, 18 March 2005):
"Beyond digitization, the Internet, with search engines, inaugurates a new form of access to knowledge. We probably have to learn from Google, whose success comes largely from its simplicity and ease of access. "

This new form of access to knowledge is very worrying because we know the true power of this engine, unless the technologies it uses. On the one hand its search algorithm which makes its success is based on what is called the pageranking. The more a site is listed, the higher its ranking in the order of answers will be better. We see using it that ads are: it Google adwords technology based on an auction of brand names. (On this point we must note several condemnations by French courts. "In October 2003, the Nanterre court sentenced him for the first time Google for infringement of trademarks on the tour operator online 'Exchange of Flight'. Last December The same Court of Nanterre has again ordered Google on the same ground as a result of a complaint filed by the Hotel Meridien. Friday, February 4, Google has been convicted for the third time and again under the same grounds infringement trademark, pursued by the group LVMH's luxury brand Louis Vuitton. The search engine scoop of 200 000 euros in damages for trademark infringement, unfair competition and misleading advertising. "Reminds us www.silicon.fr site. The same source shows us what we are heading towards a feature available only to U.S., in beta, autolink. Quickly dubbed "the devil" by users. "Take an example: we asked as a query ISBN (U.S. code) of a book. Button 'AutoLink' was then transformed into "Show Book Info". A click on what looks like a book information sought, and opens a new window in Internet Explorer that displays the page of the book ... the site looked on Amazon.com! "

Google insidiously introduced (intentionally or not) a mass of knowledge. A bit like a library acquisition policy based his books on the number of copies sold. It's actually quite logical to see it, we live for several years under the dictatorship of the ratings and let us TF1 brags buy us time to brain. Our politicians have understood this, and have adopted this technique to adapt their speech to their target voters, which is slightly more evolved, admittedly, the famous housewife least fifty years. But that does not raise the quality of political debate, it flattens the.

The W3C is responsible for laying down standards of the Web is working on a new concept of Semantic Web. Can be found at the URL: http://www.urfist.cict.fr/lettres/lettre28/lettre28-22.html, a translation of the seminal article on this concept, written by Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila and which appeared in Scientific American. Tim Berners-Lee is not anyone, he is the inventor of the World Wide Web while working at CERN. And it's April 22, 1993, date or a young student, Marc Andreessen is available to all Internet browser Mosaic, which was a smash hit the Internet became easily accessible to the general public and the adventure began. Naive and enthusiastic at that time I never imagined that it would turn into a nightmare.

Read this article. This is not science fiction, it will happen, and I am sure that Tim is sure that will improve our lives. Assessment services needed by the intelligent agent Pete to find the doctor will be ad hoc commercial structures, with all the predictable excesses. Personally I think Pete is wrong to challenge the choice of agent and replace the University Hospital for a clinic closer to home, then it depends on the illness of his wife.

Standardization of knowledge and need to think, what a dream, it will be much more available to watch advertisements on television or on his 3G phone (which has also
absolutely no need for it to be UMTS is a single chip implementation in the phone that picks up radio waves and television shows, but a good marketing ploy, it becomes unnecessary to tell the truth to the consumer. Already I find it quite amazing to see so many people walking down the street, at first I thought she was talking to herself, with headphones in your ears for phone calls, listen to music from a phone that can now photograph The latest techno trendy is the moblogging that allows you to directly send the photo is just taken on his blog. You know that future phones will be equipped with hard drives, so that we can download music from their mobile phone. I can not imagine the bills of mobile addicts. The operators have no choice, telephony Typically, the POTS as saying the Anglo-Saxons (plain old telephone system) decreases, the boxes have to triple play IP telephony, TV, Internet access through ADSL make the phone almost free. And then these boxes are wireless, wireless technology, which allows us to remove all cables connected to our USB hubs are chained so ad'extension to the computer. We can again start the robot vacuum without air we put in our cables.

The newspaper Le Monde in its supplements, has an article on a population very intriguing, people who have no phone. It is true, how do they do? There are still some crazies, I saw several hundred on March 16 to attend a conference
Don Zagier "Ramanujan to Hardy, from the first to the last letter" in the small auditorium (Archie more crowded, it n 'There was no room on the steps) of the BNF. In addition to this extraordinary conference, a genius at work live, it is understood that he also holds the chair of number theory at the College de France, was completed after 20h. The 20h missed, especially the ad that follows it.

I found on Gallica, the digital library French, which indeed has some usability flaws in its interface to access if it does not usually go to a library, the original obituary Ramanujan made by Hardy at a meeting of the British Mathematical Society. Make the effort to find this document, and watch it (read the same!). If Google has invented a revolutionary technology to skip this document to the OCR for the text to the share price will reach heights never seen. Remember that there Not long ago, a few years, said AltaVista was the ultimate search engine and you would never better. I think the devil is in Google and that the company will disappear as others that were previously missed, promised a bright future, Netscape for example.

Internet works because it is a decentralized model. The fantasy of having five million volumes collected in one place is against the logic of the internet, always the same story logic of datagram (connectionless) mode per packet (connected mode). What is true for network layers is also the content.

Librarians have a huge competitive advantage over search engines, if there is something they do to perfection is the indexing of relevant books. The MARC standard and its variations did not wait for Google!

I move to beat the Americans at their own game by being like them in a pragmatic sense, but unlike them not on a commercial basis.

Now there is a technology known to the public with a name very barbaric: OAI-PMH (Open Archives Initiative's Protocol for Metadata Harvesting) which is fully adapted to the library world, besides the Ministry of Culture and Communication, via the Department of books and reading promotes this technology: http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/dll / OAI-PMH.htm.

An example being better than a speech, if this harvester OAI http://www.oaister.org/o/oaister/
you are looking for books Cauchy scanned the net, and you put Cauchy in the "Search all fields" answers you have 2759 digitized books available in about 60 libraries with specific information, such as the BNF:

Record 1 of 4

Title Complete works of Augustin Cauchy. 1st ser. Volume X. / Publ. eds. Scientific Academy of Sciences.
Author / Creator Cauchy. Augustin-Louis. Contributor
Academy of Sciences. France. Publisher
Gauthier-Villars. Paris

Year 1897 Resource Type text
Resource Type Format Resource monograph
image / pdf eng

Language Notes University of Orsay
Subject Mathematics. - 19th century
URL http://gallica.bnf.fr/document?O=oai:bnf.fr:gallica/NUMM-90190
Rights Stock institution
Gallica: The Digital Library of the Bibliotheque Nationale de France
It is
cataloged a book by someone whose job it is.

The same query in Google you will get lots of hits on this French mathematician (remember, the Cauchy sequences which allow the construction of the toughest field of real numbers), but if you search using a digitized book available on the internet, good luck.

I come to tell me what's great about Google is that the responses we make the issue.

The idea seems to be in tune with the times in view of the mission entrusted by the President of the Republic Minister of Culture and Communication and chair of the National Library of France to build a European digital library and a virtual 'European Google' is excellent, provided that this library is distributed especially not centralized, and we put agreed that each library to set up an OAI server in order to find the books as a search engine library, with a specific intellectual logic, which involves cataloging, but it is already done for the paper edition and certainly put on computer, so it is only extracting a database to another, and OAI harvesters such as the University of Michigan. In technical terms we say that the OAI are stored in warehouses, and we call harvesting (metadata harvesting, MH OAI-PMH) to harvest the fact of these meta data warehouses.

must of course reflect on aspects of multilingualism, but libraries know exchanging data with libraries in other countries.

This project is:

· Realistic as demonstrated on more than 5 million volumes in over 400 libraries across the world.
¸ aise to implement.
· Little expensive for the implementation of OAI harvesters which will search the meta data from across Europe.
· Scientist: search criteria are those long used in all libraries in the world. This avoids the catch-all "to Google."
° does not need a revolutionary technology, the technology is.
• Observe standards of the Internet.
• Observe the logic of the Internet.
· The money will be needed to accelerate the digitization programs already in place.

I heard about robots turning the pages of books and scanning them at high speed. To go even faster, Google is expected to propose trimming books, losing a good binder we will not make a drama. How will they do for the brittle books? We have a side effect of the announcement, which seemed to many unrealistic and untrue, the other a project that can be operational in a few months and that values the library profession and ensures that relevant scientific results.

It seems to me that there is no comparison.

CHTMLXC CHTMLXC